U.S. President Donald Trump is in Hanoi for his second summit with Kim Jong Un amid hopes for a deal that would lead to the North Korean leader giving up his nuclear weapons, VOA reports.
“I think we’ll have a very tremendous summit. We want denuclearization, and I think he’ll have a country that will set a lot of records for speed in terms of an economy,” Trump said in remarks at the White House before departing Monday.
National Security Advisor John Bolton, two months ago, said a second summit was needed because North Korea had yet to live up to the commitments it made last June in Singapore.
After the Trump-Kim meeting in Singapore, Trump declared, “there is no longer a nuclear threat from North Korea.”
But as he meets Wednesday and Thursday with Kim in Hanoi, the Vietnamese capital, there is little concrete evidence that progress has been made to set the specific terms of North Korea’s promised denuclearization.
On Wednesday evening, Trump will have a brief one-on-one conversation with Kim followed by a dinner that will include U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney. Kim will also have two aides present and both men will have translators.
Trump and Kim will then hold a series of official meetings Thursday.
U.S. President Donald Trump is heading to Hanoi for his second summit with Kim Jong Un amid hopes for a deal that would lead to the North Korean leader to give up his nuclear weapons.https://t.co/ZoFzwJyp43 pic.twitter.com/BVOa7pRhGQ
— The Voice of America (@VOANews) February 25, 2019
Progress needed
A lack of a major breakthrough for the second time could have negative political ramifications for Trump.
“If the president makes substantive concessions, I think he will get serious bipartisan criticism,” says James Jay Carafano, the vice president of the Heritage Foundation’s institute for national security and foreign policy.
That would “probably be the last thing he needs” amid the possible release this week of a summary of the special counsel’s report into ties between Russia and Trump’s 2016 election campaign, adds Carafano.
“If the report is good news, a distraction is bad,” Carafano tells VOA. “If it’s bad news, it will compound his problems.”
Some analysts, however, predict there would be scant political damage for Trump as he can just declare a foreign policy victory.
“All it takes is Kim pretending to disarm and Trump pretending to believe him,” says Vipin Narang, an associate professor of political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
“So long as Kim doesn’t embarrass Trump publicly by testing a nuclear weapon or a ballistic missile, domestically Trump can keep rinsing and repeating,” Narang, author of the book Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Era tells VOA. “The advantage for Trump is that Kim’s continued expansion of his nuclear weapons program is largely silent, and, at best, shows up on page 10” of local newspapers in the United States.
“If nothing positive happens, the Democratic Party hawks and the media may mock Trump’s pretensions and claims to be a master negotiator,” says Professor Peter Kuznick, director of the Nuclear Studies Institute at American University. “But as long as tensions don’t re-erupt on the Korean peninsula, most Americans will be satisfied with the status quo and move on to other issues.”